Am I literally the only person

[very_improbable]

who thinks that Peter Morgan is not actually a good screenwriter? I can't fault him on matters of structure, but I don't think he, you know, writes good lines. When he has to convey a piece of exposition or a character's opinion on something (which accounts for most of The Queen) he loses whatever sense of character voice he had and everybody sounds like a newspaper editorial, and most of the time when he goes for a moment of emotional truth it's on the clunky side.

I mean, I saw Frost/Nixon tonight and I thought the film was extremely well-done and gripping, and the dialogue that was identical to or closely modeled on the historical record was dramatically compelling, and it basically did not have good dialogue other than that. But, like Nixon, I appear to have an opinion that is shared by no one.

Comments

[swallowedbysky.livejournal.com]

It's funny, I saw the play last year and walked out with the distinct sense that I would have like it better than a movie which was a huge first for me.

I watched the movie with that in mind, and while it did work better on screen, I was so focused on that comparison that I didn't absorb much beyond that.

[very-improbable.livejournal.com]

I had that problem with Doubt--I never quite felt like I was absorbing it as a movie because I kept thinking of the play.

[swallowedbysky.livejournal.com]

I haven't seen Doubt yet, but a friend's brother said exactly the same thing last week.