Showrunner Hart Hanson on Bones:
1) Oh! You had a clever idea to make the LADY the RATIONAL one and the DUDE the INTUITIVE one! Congratulations. You've invented THE FUCKING X-FILES.
1a) I mean, it's bad enough that this wacky gender switcheroo was presented as a clever twist in the first place, back when XF first aired, seventeen years ago.
2) ...as the transcriber points out, Spock, Kirk, Aubrey, and Maturin are all men. Even if we are giving a lot of leeway for tongue-in-cheek-ness in his tone (a lot of the talk is a sorta cheeky commentary on how being on network TV in America means not doing a whole lot that runs counter to what the broad audience finds comfortable), there is no reading of this that makes sense.
3) Which brings me to, though, the question that this now inspires: What are all these shows where there's an unpredictable emotional intuitive lady having adventures or solving mysteries or whatever with a hard-headed scientist dude? Besides the last two seasons of XF, in which Doggett and Reyes, I guess, "swapped" the "gender roles" back to intuitive-woman-skeptical-man in contrast with Scully and Mulder.
Anyone? I have been turning this over in my head and I've kind of actually got nothing.
The two main characters are timeless. Basically, it’s Spock and Captain Kirk, for those of you who are old enough for that. Aubrey and Maturin, for those of you who are older. One is a scientist and thinks very rationally, and the other is an extremely emotional, intuitive person. Little tricks, we swapped the roles, so the guy is the girl and the girl is the guy.
1) Oh! You had a clever idea to make the LADY the RATIONAL one and the DUDE the INTUITIVE one! Congratulations. You've invented THE FUCKING X-FILES.
1a) I mean, it's bad enough that this wacky gender switcheroo was presented as a clever twist in the first place, back when XF first aired, seventeen years ago.
2) ...as the transcriber points out, Spock, Kirk, Aubrey, and Maturin are all men. Even if we are giving a lot of leeway for tongue-in-cheek-ness in his tone (a lot of the talk is a sorta cheeky commentary on how being on network TV in America means not doing a whole lot that runs counter to what the broad audience finds comfortable), there is no reading of this that makes sense.
3) Which brings me to, though, the question that this now inspires: What are all these shows where there's an unpredictable emotional intuitive lady having adventures or solving mysteries or whatever with a hard-headed scientist dude? Besides the last two seasons of XF, in which Doggett and Reyes, I guess, "swapped" the "gender roles" back to intuitive-woman-skeptical-man in contrast with Scully and Mulder.
Anyone? I have been turning this over in my head and I've kind of actually got nothing.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-26 04:16 pm (UTC)I know. I gotta go back to Scarecrow & Mrs. King, actually.
But it does remind me of a meta about these pairings where the man is all wacky and out of control and the woman basically plays cop/camp counselor/school marm. That isn't true of Bones, actually, but it's true of XF and Mentalist and House and I find it annoying - it allows the men a lot of freedom and women have to be boring.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-26 10:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-26 04:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-26 04:22 pm (UTC)Yes, which forces a reading in which both Kirk and Jack Aubrey are somehow "the girl" in their respective series. Except for the part where they're in charge, I guess? And also the macho action guy?
It's an interesting light on gender stereotypes: if you're intuitive, emotional, and male, congratulations, you're the hero! If you're intuitive, emotional, and female . . . you're just a silly girl and we probably don't have room for you on the show (or in the book) anyway.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-26 06:47 pm (UTC)for the record, I've seen Bones a couple times and I thought it was fine
Date: 2010-02-26 10:51 pm (UTC)Thank you for the compliment, though. :)
Re: for the record, I've seen Bones a couple times and I thought it was fine
Date: 2010-02-26 10:55 pm (UTC)But no worries!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-26 06:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-26 10:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-02-27 03:04 am (UTC)